Curious about anonymized screenshots showing supposed SEO wins? Let’s uncover why there seem to be more horror stories than successes in SEO.
Many are simply unable to share their work even when it’s successful. How can SEOs stop practicing “ghost optimization”?
Before we dive into this question, let’s look at the reasons for the ongoing secrecy and still prevailing negativity among SEO practitioners.
SEO horror stories, anyone?
One of the most popular SEO hashtags within the industry over recent years has been #seohorrorstories.
Why are SEO experts much more likely to share the horrible failures of the industry and their colleagues than their own success stories?
Is this the overall prevailing negativity of society as a whole? Or do we have an internal problem aggravating the situation?
I think it’s probably both.
First off, the recent years have led to a never-ending, downward spiral of public debate. Diplomacy has made way for trolling.
When even presidents provoke people online to get attention, how is everybody else meant to stay civil in day-to-day conversations?
Also, social media like Facebook and Twitter have been capitalizing on fear and anger.
Such “bad news” goes straight to our lizard brain and elicits fearful and angry reactions without consulting the parts of the brain responsible for logical thinking.
No wonder that even within the relatively professional SEO industry, the discourse has degenerated into the realm of “OMG! Look at that nonsense! How stupid!”
I’m exaggerating a bit, but that’s the essence of most shares where #seohorrorstories are involved.
These are more than cautionary tales. It’s also a way of ridiculing those reckless enough to get caught red-handed while employing outdated SEO tactics.
Perhaps the thought process is that when one can’t shed light on their actual successes, then highlight others’ failures. This way, they indirectly stand in a better light by sheer comparison.
Of course, this is merely guesswork. The motivation behind the many horror stories may vary. It won’t simply gloat or malice, in most cases.
‘Look at this random graph, please – the growth is stellar!’
There is also a compromise, anonymized “success” stories – where the alleged success can’t be fully reviewed by peers.
Such stories seem to be the middle ground between failure and success stories. So what is the logic behind them, then?
You will find lots of social media posts shared of random graphs without any URL connected to them.
It’s usually an analytics screenshot clumsily anonymized before publication. Ultimately, the stellar growth they exhibit lacks any credibility.
I’m usually acquainted with those who share such success stories, so I know they won’t lie.
In most cases, they also add as much context as possible without giving away any meaningful detail so that you cannot track down the website they’re talking about.
What about industry outsiders and potential clients?
They have no idea who the people sharing the graphs are and how trustworthy the information is.
What is the purpose of sharing graphs without any context?
Again, I can only guess.
- Some SEO experts try to convey their expertise that way.
- Others share their success out of sheer joy at having made it.
- Some may want additional opinions on what happened when things went wrong.
Take note that #seohorrorstories are quite often anonymous. That way, some limited peer review does happen within a very small perimeter. It’s better than nothing, right?
Are there any SEO hero stories?
Some of you may have noticed. I have been looking for SEO hero (as in superhero) stories for two months and have been quite aggressive about it.
There were far fewer success stories than bad news from the SEO industry. Yet, I was astounded that even the prospect of getting additional free publicity did not motivate many SEO companies, in-house SEOs or SEO consultants to divulge their success stories or share their case studies with me.
I started a similar hashtag inspired by #seohorrorstories called #seoherostories to encourage sharing such positive examples, but it seemed like I was the only one using it.
Are SEO experts ashamed of their work or afraid to show it?
Given the poor reputation of the SEO industry in the last 25 years, it’s no wonder some people are not keen on outing themselves as SEO practitioners.
Numerous SEOs still engage in unethical practices, which might be why they are ashamed to show what they do.
Still, others may simply be afraid. I probed about the reasons behind this fear, and here are the obvious ones.
Manual Google penalties
This is an age-old fear of SEO practitioners stemming back from the early days. Sometimes, outing yourself as a practitioner of the dark arts of SEO – and mentioning the actual website you’re working on – was akin to suicide for your project.
Even before the somewhat weird term “manual action” was introduced by Google, penalties have been known to hit out of the blue and after too much publicity for SEO practitioners’ work.
This fear is no longer reasonable. And like most fears, it’s rather irrational.
SEOs are not criminals, and hiding is not necessary in most cases.
‘Secret sauce’ copycats
Another albeit more likely scenario is that the competition may steal your “secret sauce” and copy your SEO techniques.
While this is possible, it’s important to realize who your competition on the web is. Most SEOs would still say something like “businesses who sell the same thing in the same area.”
The reality of Google SERPs or the “SERP real estate” is that you mainly compete against the web giants:
- Google itself pushes its own services and ads above actual organic results.
- Huge websites like Amazon or Wikipedia are always on top by sheer popularity.
Would a competitor or colleague who happens to have a similar business as you really hurt you that much by looking at your site’s SEO?
Also, anybody can look up your secret sauce by using a tool like Semrush and find out about on- and off-page SEO with ease. So, why hide your success from the general public?
Client-stealing competitors
The other fear relating to the competition is that other SEOs may see who you work with and, thus, contact them and “steal your clients.”
People do this. I have had several clients notifying me of such attempts over the years.
I don’t think I lost any clients that way, though. Why? Is it just because I’m such an expert?
Probably not. I was a beginner at the time as well.
It’s such a sneaky practice that business people are not fond of offers made that way. If they are, you may be lucky to get rid of them.
Toxic clients often hurt you more than they help financially. I had to learn that lesson the hard way over the years, trying to satisfy everybody.
I believe the above common “reasons” for not sharing SEO work are often irrational fears and traditions – merely excuses.
One reasonable explanation for why someone would not want to share the actual website address or their “stellar growth” chart is that the work is still in progress.
Many other parts of the project were far from ready for prime time, and it was not a good idea to share them prematurely. I’ve only heard that justification once, though, even when I asked many times.
NDA: The dreaded acronym
A common explanation for not publishing actual results or disclosing website addresses and client names is the typical non-disclosure agreement (NDA). It may as well be called a “gag order,” as most SEO experts have to shut up completely about their work.
Some popular search marketers, including John Doherty and Brendan Hufford, emphasized this point on LinkedIn.